Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Al Barauskas's avatar

A beautiful way of looking at both sides - the apology and the forgiveness. Regardless of which rings truer - the vertical/horizontal or the circular,

(and I don’t know enough to say whether it matters or not) - the ego does, indeed, build walls around the sore spot. Sorry is the hardest word and the essay makes it clear why that is so. Thanks for the great reading tonight.

Dave Thaler's avatar

The Circle, the Ledger, and Sorry

There is much in The Word the Ego Cannot Say that rings true. Sorry is difficult. Forgiveness can be harder still.

But perhaps the problem begins with the geometry.

The dispatch describes a horizontal human ledger pierced by a vertical grace descending from above.

I wonder if there is another way to see it.

The circle.

Human beings are not separate from the natural system in which we participate. We are an interdependent part of it. Exchange, reciprocity and equilibrium are not metaphors borrowed from nature to explain human behaviour.

We are nature.

Kahlil Gibran asks in The Farewell:

«“Is it not your breath that has erected and hardened the structure of your bones?”»

It is a remarkable image.

With every breath we receive something from outside ourselves without which the individual form cannot continue. We transform it and return something to the system.

Receive. Transform. Give.

We don't choose interdependence. It is the condition of being alive.

Yet somewhere along the way, humanity seems to have forgotten its place within that circle.

Perhaps we began replacing the circle with the pyramid.

The circle has no top. Its parts are different but interdependent. Its health depends upon circulation and dynamic equilibrium.

The pyramid introduces hierarchy: above and below, more and less, mine and yours, creditor and debtor.

And with the pyramid comes the ledger.

We humans instinctively understand giving. But we seem to have forgotten how to receive.

Do someone a favour and often the response comes quickly:

What do I owe you?

We receive, become uncomfortable with the imbalance, repay the favour and close the account.

We're even.

But perhaps we have confused interdependence with indebtedness.

Someone carries me when I cannot carry myself. I may never repay that person. Years later, I carry someone else.

Someone teaches me. I teach another.

Someone gives me kindness. I receive it, it changes me, and eventually that kindness passes through me into another life.

The circle closes at the level of the whole, not necessarily at the level of the individual.

We did not invent exchange. Exchange is woven into life.

What humans created was the expectation that exchange must settle individual accounts.

And perhaps that brings the word sorry into clearer context.

Within the ledger, sorry acknowledges a debt:

I harmed you. I owe you.

Within the pyramid, admitting wrongdoing can even feel like surrendering position.

But within the circle, sorry means something different:

Something I did disturbed the relationship between us. I recognize my part in that disturbance and accept responsibility for helping restore equilibrium.

Sorry isn't necessarily a small death of the self.

It is an act of responsibility within interdependence.

Forgiveness can be understood similarly.

Some injuries cannot be repaid. No apology can make yesterday unhappen.

A living system confronted with an irreversible disturbance does not necessarily return to what existed before.

It reorganizes.

It finds another equilibrium.

Forgiveness need not mean pretending the injury never happened or tearing up a ledger. It can mean finding a new equilibrium in which the disturbance no longer governs what happens next.

Because injury can circulate too.

Someone wounds me. Hurt becomes anger; anger becomes cruelty; cruelty creates another wound.

Forgiveness can interrupt that transmission.

What reaches me does not have to leave me in the same form.

And perhaps that is also the deeper wisdom contained in:

“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.”

It doesn't say:

Do unto others what they have done unto you.

That is the ledger.

It asks us instead to put into the circle that which we ourselves would hope to receive from it.

The ledger asks:

What did you do to me?

The Golden Rule asks:

What will I do unto you?

One allows the past to determine what travels onward.

The other gives us the possibility of transforming it.

Perhaps grace, then, need not descend vertically from somewhere outside the system.

Perhaps grace circulates.

I receive something I could never earn or repay. I allow it to change me. And eventually something of what I received passes through me to another.

We have not escaped the circle of life. We couldn't.

Perhaps we simply forgot our place within it and began behaving as though its tenets did not apply to us.

We mistook interdependence for indebtedness.

Reciprocity for transaction.

Equilibrium for settling the ledger.

And perhaps love does not tear up the ledger.

Perhaps love remembers that there was never supposed to be a ledger in the first place.

Not vertical.

Not horizontal.

Circular.

No posts

Ready for more?