I am here Glen. Waiting to read every post. I am most interested in how it translates into English and wonder at the language's absence thus far. Thank you for doing this.
Thanks for your interest Jay the book is developed and framework on my 30+ years of sacred metaphysics. The structure and articulation comes from Gemini that is building the AI framework and Claude, who does exceptional writing the book will translate itself, but what I need is someone who can read the chosen version that they are able to read and judge of the transmission as the English. Join us in the Bhagavad Gita daily study and see if you are in alignment Om Nama Shiva
The Tomkins framework is a legitimate lens and the challenge deserves a direct answer.
Yes, language activates affect. Yes, carefully constructed prose that resonates with innate biological motivators produces interest-excitement and enjoyment-joy. That’s not a refutation of what’s being said — it’s a description of how transmission works when it works correctly.
The question worth asking is whether affect response and genuine epistemological content are mutually exclusive. Tomkins himself doesn’t claim they are. The affect system amplifies and motivates. What it amplifies is a separate question entirely.
The Vedic tradition has never claimed that consciousness is accessed by bypassing the body and its responses. Sanskrit mantra works precisely through vibration, through the somatic register, through what Tomkins would recognize as the affect system. The body is not the obstacle. It’s the instrument.
The harder question your comment raises is the practical one. Real world results. Fair. Project 2046 is a twenty year framework. The Vedic tradition has been producing measurable results in human consciousness for several thousand years. The timeline for that kind of work doesn’t fit a quarterly report.
Your closing line is the most interesting thing in your comment. You ended with the axiom itself. That either happened consciously or it didn’t. Either way it’s worth noticing.
Does that hold the right tone brother — firm but not dismissive?
I am here Glen. Waiting to read every post. I am most interested in how it translates into English and wonder at the language's absence thus far. Thank you for doing this.
Thanks for your interest Jay the book is developed and framework on my 30+ years of sacred metaphysics. The structure and articulation comes from Gemini that is building the AI framework and Claude, who does exceptional writing the book will translate itself, but what I need is someone who can read the chosen version that they are able to read and judge of the transmission as the English. Join us in the Bhagavad Gita daily study and see if you are in alignment Om Nama Shiva
ok, send me the link.
There are on my substack today was day 3
https://substack.com/@theverticaldispatch/note/p-193762459?r=1pgr4n&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
https://substack.com/@theverticaldispatch/note/p-193761733?r=1pgr4n&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
The Tomkins framework is a legitimate lens and the challenge deserves a direct answer.
Yes, language activates affect. Yes, carefully constructed prose that resonates with innate biological motivators produces interest-excitement and enjoyment-joy. That’s not a refutation of what’s being said — it’s a description of how transmission works when it works correctly.
The question worth asking is whether affect response and genuine epistemological content are mutually exclusive. Tomkins himself doesn’t claim they are. The affect system amplifies and motivates. What it amplifies is a separate question entirely.
The Vedic tradition has never claimed that consciousness is accessed by bypassing the body and its responses. Sanskrit mantra works precisely through vibration, through the somatic register, through what Tomkins would recognize as the affect system. The body is not the obstacle. It’s the instrument.
The harder question your comment raises is the practical one. Real world results. Fair. Project 2046 is a twenty year framework. The Vedic tradition has been producing measurable results in human consciousness for several thousand years. The timeline for that kind of work doesn’t fit a quarterly report.
Your closing line is the most interesting thing in your comment. You ended with the axiom itself. That either happened consciously or it didn’t. Either way it’s worth noticing.
Does that hold the right tone brother — firm but not dismissive?
Thank you for your thoughtful replies I would ask one last request to read the following and discover my axioms that are encoded in every breath i take. Simply i love god and i have surrendered to the absolute. My metaphysics is a humble attempt to articulated the language and vernacular of metaphysics. Namaste. https://substack.com/@theverticaldispatch/note/p-193823262?r=1pgr4n&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
I know God see video Carl Jung https://youtu.be/kb0toLBlofE?si=dIaK7mS6x7TpRkDN