I find the humility and the distinction between doer and deed is quite liberating. Opens the door to honest engagement with others and re-owning shadow bits of oneself. Funny that. The more one is familiar with vertical ascent, the more shadow pieces step into that light.
That was precisely my question. At what accumulation of deeds does it become possible to make a judgment call? Can you not read the person in the accumulated history of deeds, separate from your own shadow?
An interesting read.
What is the read when the public figure over and over again creates that breach of good faith and acts against the masses?
Would we then be correct in assigning a value to that?
As always, thought provoking
🙏🏾
I find the humility and the distinction between doer and deed is quite liberating. Opens the door to honest engagement with others and re-owning shadow bits of oneself. Funny that. The more one is familiar with vertical ascent, the more shadow pieces step into that light.
Thought provoking read. My thoughts ... a repeated action reveals a pattern that illuminates the direction of the one who acted - repeatedly.
That was precisely my question. At what accumulation of deeds does it become possible to make a judgment call? Can you not read the person in the accumulated history of deeds, separate from your own shadow?